Monday, March 30, 2015
Say what?
I’m sorry, but the ultimate pro-life, pro-poor,
pro-family issue that the Bible calls Christians to engage in is bringing the
lost to Christ (see CANON). For the
leader of the largest church in the world to state otherwise brings into
question his beliefs.
Saturday, March 28, 2015
The O’Reilly Spin Zone
O’Reilly: “It is long past time for Americans to stop
the ideological nonsense and see things for what they really are. Mr. Obama has made very serious mistakes in
foreign policy and the entire War on Terror is now going against the good guys
-- us and other anti-jihadist nations. The
mistakes must stop.”
In O’Reilly’s Spin Zone, Obama does not
act for ideological reasons, he acts out of incompetence. He makes mistakes.Friday, March 27, 2015
The Baal Tyrants’ list of preferences
A Baal Tyrant website reveals their preference for
Republican presidential candidates:
1)
Jeb
Bush
2)
Scott
Walker
3)
Other
Republican contenders
Ted Cruz is not on the list.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Excerpts from Ted Cruz announcement for presidential run
There are people who wonder if faith is real. I can
tell you, in my family there’s not a second of doubt, because were it not for
the transformative love of Jesus Christ, I would not have been saved and I
would have been raised by a single mom without my father in the household.
For so many Americans, the promise of America seems
more and more distant. What is the promise of America? The idea that -- the
revolutionary idea that this country was founded upon, which is that our rights
don’t come from man. They come from God Almighty.
Today, roughly half of born again Christians aren’t
voting. They’re staying home. Imagine instead millions of people of faith all
across America coming out to the polls and voting our values.
God’s blessing has been on America from the very
beginning of this nation, and I believe God isn’t done with America yet.
T.C. = True Conservative
With Ted Cruz as president, hopefully leading a more
conservative Republican congress starting in 2017, this nation will be led out from
under this Baal Tyranny (that is, if the country can last for 21 more months
under Obama).
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
And now we have the Jeb Bush / Pope Francis connection
Makes sense. See my post below “Is Pope Francis’ church like
Obama’s church?” and other posts of mine regarding Pope Francis. Also, see the connection with my RINO Theorem
in my post “What’s going on with the Democrat Baal Tyrants?”
Extraordinary!
The Daily
Beast calls out the Democrats for their Baal Capitalism! Including questioning Elizabeth Warren about
why she supports it. Just who do they
want in 2016?
Friday, March 13, 2015
Is Pope Francis’ church like Obama’s church?
”perhaps
the most liberal of the Mainline Protestant American denominations?”
“his
relationship with the UCC represents the perfect marriage of church and
politician.”
“it draws
on selective Christian teachings and selective Christian traditions to provide
general spiritual comfort and, specifically, to inspire its members to progressive
social activism.”
“The
result of this theology is a transition of focus from a relationship with the
divine to a relationship with man, and to advocacy of very specific social
policies.”
“Accepting
love requires a form of justice that is inclusive of all people, particularly
those who in some way have been marginalized by oppressive social practice.”
“The
mission of the Church is, therefore, to see that those who have been rejected
are included, for justice as inclusion defines public policy.”
“The
result is a practical equivalence between the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and
a particular form of social justice.”
President
Obama’s church, at its core, is thoroughly and officially invested in politics.
“the
church connects members to far-left social-justice resources.”
“There is
remarkable conformity, in fact, between President Obama’s words and policies
and his church’s official positions on public policy — a level of conformity that
would cause alarms to ring across the progressive spectrum if there were
similar Evangelical church statements to which a conservative president
adhered.”
“The UCC
and the rest of the Protestant Mainline offer little religion in the classical
sense, but rather spiritualized politics supplemented with personal inspiration
and self-created meaning — inspiration and meaning that they believe can be
gained from virtually any other major religion.”
“But when
it comes to his civic religion, President Obama is his church’s — and liberal
Christianity’s — great and mighty instrument.”
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Monday, March 9, 2015
Thursday, March 5, 2015
What’s going on with the Democrat Baal Tyrants?
I think a lot of people are shocked that the left
wing media seems to be going after Hillary and suggesting other establishment candidates should run
against her. I’m thinking that maybe
they are thinking the RINO strategy worked so well over the past couple of
elections that they want to try it. They
will have a bunch of establishment Democrats run against each other so that the
votes will be split among them and then the more left-wing candidate will win
the nomination. However, I’m sure they
think their strategy will work differently than the RINO strategy in that the
candidate nominated will defeat whoever the Republicans nominate.
I pretty much defined the RINO strategy when I used
to post my theorem on the Politics Forum.
Here is my theorem:
RINO will willingly lose elections if, in
so doing, it prevents Conservatives from winning them.
Hypotheses
1.
Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
different results.
2. RINO are not insane (this one is
debateable). Therefore, there must be a
method to their madness.
3. RINO know that their policies are weak. But they think that their policies are more
acceptable than Democrats’ and Conservatives’ policies.
4. RINO prefer Democrat policies over
Conservative policies.
5. RINO try to make their policies more
acceptable to voters by calling the Conservatives extremists.
6. RINO know from experience that they cannot
win against Democrats. People who want
Democrat policies vote for Democrats and people who want Conservative policies
vote for Conservatives. There aren’t
enough people left to vote for RINO to get them elected.
7. Even though RINO know they cannot win against
Democrats, they will work to get nominations to run against Democrats so that
the Conservatives cannot even compete against the Democrats.
Proofs
1. Even though RINO
John McCain had lost to Democrat Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential
election, RINO Mitt Romney ran against Obama in the 2012 presidential
election. Romney was in a series of
Republican debates where he was pitted against several Conservatives. Because he could get the “moderate” vote and
the other votes were split among the Conservatives, he won the Republican
nomination. Romney then went on to lose
the election against Obama.
2. Even though RINO
John McCain lost to Democrat Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election and
RINO Mitt Romney lost to Obama in the 2012 presidential election, RINO Jeb Bush
will run against Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential
election. Bush will be in a series of
Republican debates where he will be pitted against several Conservatives. The Republican National Committee is limiting
the number of these debates because of the fear that one Conservative could
over the course of too many debates become the leading candidate. Because Bush will get the “moderate” vote and
the other votes will be split among the Conservatives, Bush will win the
Republican nomination. Bush will then go
on to lose the election against Clinton (ala 1992 Bush vs Clinton).
3. Jeb Bush said on Dec. 1, 2014
“A nominee should lose the primary to win the general”. Of course, being a politician, he says the
opposite of what he thinks. He really
means “A nominee should win
the primary to lose the general.”
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Monday, March 2, 2015
A Catholic tyrant’s spin on the Pope
Please also see my previous post by another Catholic
“Is this why no show (82122.4)?” at BaalTyranny.blogspot.com.
Also, see BaalTyranny.blogspot.com CANON button.
Some quotes from the article:
The Pope is engaged in a struggle to bring the
Church into the modern age. And American conservatives are fighting him every
step of the way.
The world’s most renowned Christian theological
guide is, of course, the Pope.
Each Pope, therefore, must make use of the richness
of Church tradition, while also ministering effectively to a world of
ever-evolving challenges and realities.
Legendarily plainspoken Philadelphia Archbishop
Charles Chaput said that the right wing of the Church “generally have not been
really happy” with Francis’s papacy.
In May 2014, conservative Catholic writer Michael
Brendan Dougherty published a provocative op-ed in The Week arguing that
“Catholics must learn to resist their Popes—even Pope Francis.” Dougherty suggested that the legitimacy of
papal teaching—and in a sense, the principle of papal infallibility—was subject
to review by the greater body of Catholic faithful. The duty of the believer,
he concluded, “is not just to rebuke and correct those in authority ... but to
throw rotting cabbage at them, or make them miserable.”
There have always been grumblings about popes, but
the differences in opinion between Francis and the movement collectively known
as the “American right” appear especially numerous.
Irving Kristol, an influential neoconservative,
wrote in his 1976 essay “What Is a Neoconservative?” that conservatives should
be “respectful of traditional values and institutions” as a central tenet of
their politics and practice. Kristol believed that obligation to “the
sovereignty of traditional values” kept people moored to the past in a way that
prevented the nihilism that leads to authoritarianism and anomie. The freedom
of markets and appropriate weakness of the state depend on citizens preferring
traditional modes of living to the heady vertigo of progressivism.
Suspicion of a Catholic gesture toward modernity—and
thus the world—colors the attitudes of conservative Catholics toward him.
Pope Francis approaches the past with dialogue,
not mere deference, in mind. He knows that the only useful approach to the
past is to recognize it as a work in progress. This has the effect of imbuing
accumulated tradition with no special authority over current conclusions. The
present and the past must speak as equals, as both are works of human effort.
From that alone conservatively disposed Catholics might flinch. This
attitude—this disposition—allows him to utilize a modern lexicon while drawing
on Church tradition. Consider, for instance, his remarks on financial
inequality, in which he called for a “legitimate redistribution of economic
benefits by the state.”
Every blowhard with a stake in unmitigated
capitalism, from Rush Limbaugh to The Economist, has had their turn at accusing
Francis of sundry McCarthyist infractions, Marxist, Leninist, and otherwise.
Francis’s handling of tradition and modernity
privileges neither, but rather produces a workable synthesis of their
contributions. Conservative appeals to the past, in contrast, rely on the sort
of “decline” narrative for which they seem especially partial. Newly elected
Republican Senator Joni Ernst used her response to this year’s State of the
Union Address to reminisce about her childhood in Iowa, recalling that “[my]
parents may not have had much, but they worked hard for what they did have.” Ernst’s
words harken back to a time when people were satisfied with poverty. They also
cast modern-day folk in a less-than-flattering light: We don’t work for what we
have and instead subsist on oft-maligned handouts like welfare. Finally, those
who do work have less to show for it than the imagined bootstrappers of
yesteryear, thanks to the regulatory bogeyman that is the federal government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)