Friday, May 1, 2015

O’Reilly’s Spin Zone is dangerous

O’Reilly says “there is no systemic effort to keep down black people in America.”

Has he never heard of the concept that the Tyrants need a permanent underclass to vote for them?  He would call that the ideological belief of the right-wing loons.  He doesn’t want to veer into the truth because that might hurt his ratings.  His belief is that people want nonpartisan patter and so that is what he gives them.

The truth is what I have stated in the CANON:  the Tyrants steal from free market capitalists and they lie and say that they are benefiting their subjects while they are stealing from them.  These protesters could be free market capitalists if it weren’t for the Tyrants stealing from the free market capitalists.  I can’t wait until Mark Levin’s new book “Plunder and Deceit” comes out in August.

Because of the media like Bill O’Reilly, who don’t tell the truth about the Tyrants, these black people vote in overwhelming numbers for the Tyrants.  This problem is only going to get worse until poor people start voting for conservatives.  The ultimate solution is for the nation to reject Baal and turn to the true God.


  1. What I said about the protesters not being able to get jobs also applies to their missing fathers, whom O’Reilly also likes to berate.

  2. Trickle-down Baal Capitalism

  3. Tyrants’ petri dish

  4. Juan Williams opposed to Baal Tyranny

    Of course, Bloomberg gets it wrong. They want government to do more. They say the reason that the Great Society has produced such underwhelming results is because of the black father. Their solution is to help women prevent unwanted pregnancies. Talk about a war on women. They ignore the part of what Daniel Moynihan said, “well-intentioned federal programs for the poor, specifically welfare, created perverse incentives that drove black men from their families and created a generational cycle of dependency on government.”


  7. Plunder and Deceit:
    In each of his astounding #1 New York Times bestsellers, Mark R. Levin’s overlying patriotic mission has been to avert a devastating tragedy: The loss of the greatest republic known to mankind. But who stands to lose the most?

    In modern America, the civil society is being steadily devoured by a ubiquitous federal government. But as the government grows into an increasingly authoritarian and centralized federal Leviathan, many parents continue to tolerate, if not enthusiastically champion, grievous public policies that threaten their children and successive generations with a grim future at the hands of a brazenly expanding and imploding entitlement state poised to burden them with massive debt, mediocre education, waves of immigration, and a deteriorating national defense.

    Yet tyranny is not inevitable. In Federalist 51, James Madison explained with cautionary insight the essential balance between the civil society and governmental restraint: “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

    This essential new book is, against all odds, a likeminded appeal to reason and audacity—one intended for all Americans but particularly the rising generation. Younger people must find the personal strength and will to break through the cycle of statist manipulation, unrelenting emotional overtures, and the pressure of groupthink, which are humbling, dispiriting, and absorbing them; to stand up against the heavy hand of centralized government, which if left unabated will assuredly condemn them to economic and societal calamity.

    Levin calls for a new civil rights movement, one that will foster liberty and prosperity and cease the exploitation of young people by statist masterminds. He challenges the rising generation of younger Americans to awaken to the cause of their own salvation, asking: will you acquiesce to a government that overwhelmingly acts without constitutional foundation—or will you stand in your own defense so that yours and future generations can live in freedom?




    “The president expressed full-throated support for re-enfranchising convicted felons who have served their time. ‘If folks have served their time, and they’ve re-entered society, they should be able to vote,’ he said, to loud applause.”

    Of course, he wants more Democrat voters. Unfortunately, they will vote for the very politicians that caused the conditions where they could not get jobs and caused them to choose the lifestyle that they have.



    “We pushed back [to say] that it is not her place to tell the Black Lives Matter movement or black people what to do, and that the real work doesn’t lie in the victim-blaming that that implies. And that was a rift in the conversation.”

    “We are going to have very clear demands,” says Brittany Packnett, an educator and activist. “If those aren’t met, you may see people behaving in alternative ways. People may not show up to vote.”

    “There’s something insufficient about all of them,” says one activist associated with Black Lives Matter.

    “The candidates are taking steps to convince the movement they are allies, not adversaries.”

    If only the movement understood what the root problem is and how none of those candidates will solve it.


    Maybe the Black Lives Matter activists have been reading my blog. Maybe now they realize the Baal Socialist policies will not improve their lives.


    HILLARY: I don't believe you change hearts! I believe you change laws, you change allocation of resources, you change the way systems operate.

    RUSH: Folks, right there, "I don't believe you change hearts," that can also be read, "I don't believe you change minds." What Hillary Clinton is saying here, she's not interested in persuading people. She's not interested in debating people. She's not interested in trying to get to people's hearts or minds because she doesn't think it's possible. What she wants to do is bully them. She wants to use the power and the force of government and create laws and regulations and dictate behavior that way and then come up with behavior that becomes penalized.